AI search is re-writing how people discover, compare and trust brands. Instead of scrolling through ten blue links, users increasingly read one AI-generated answer—sometimes with citations, sometimes without.
If your brand isn’t:
- included in those answers,
- cited as a source, and
- represented accurately,
you’re losing organic visibility even if your classic SEO metrics look healthy.
This guide is a master piece for IA-first visibility. We’ll go through the core IA signals, explain the Visibility Matrix (Relevance–Clarity–Facticity), show how to structure content with GEO/AEO modules, and close with a case example plus the most common mistakes to avoid.
IA visibility vs classic SEO
Classic SEO focuses on:
- ranking URLs in SERPs,
- capturing clicks,
- maximising organic sessions.
IA visibility focuses on:
- appearing inside AI-generated answers,
- being cited as an authoritative source,
- controlling how your brand and frameworks are described across engines.
You still need technical SEO, content and links—but now you must optimise for how LLMs extract, understand and reuse your information.
The three IA visibility signals: relevance, clarity, facticity
At the core of IA-first optimisation are three signals that determine whether an engine feels safe and confident including you.
Relevance
Relevance answers: “Is this the right content for this question?”
Signals of high relevance:
- the page directly addresses the same problem or intent as the query,
- headings and subheadings mirror the user’s language,
- the content type fits the need (definition, how-to, comparison, checklist).
Clarity
Clarity answers: “Can I easily understand and reuse this?”
Signals of high clarity:
- short, unambiguous sentences,
- clear structure (sections, bullets, numbered steps),
- limited jargon and well-defined terms,
- visual structures like tables and matrices that compress information.
Facticity
Facticity answers: “Can I trust these claims?”
Signals of high facticity:
- factual statements are grounded in data or clear experience,
- claims are scoped (who/when/where a statement is valid),
- dates, versions and limitations are explicit,
- the brand shows real expertise and responsible tone.
Together, these three signals—Relevance, Clarity, Facticity—form the backbone of the Visibility Matrix.
The Visibility Matrix (Relevance–Clarity–Facticity)
The Visibility Matrix is a simple framework to evaluate how “AI-ready” a page or cluster is.
You score each page (or content asset) from 1 to 3 on:
- Relevance (R) – how well it matches the user’s question,
- Clarity (C) – how easily an LLM can parse and reuse the content,
- Facticity (F) – how strong and responsible the factual grounding is.
Scoring system
- 1 = Weak
- R: loosely related topic, generic or off-angle
- C: dense text, messy structure
- F: vague claims, no evidence
- 2 = Acceptable
- R: addresses the topic but not all key intents
- C: some structure, but long or repetitive sections
- F: mostly accurate, limited sourcing
- 3 = Strong
- R: directly solves the user’s question and related variants
- C: clean structure, reusable blocks (definitions, steps, tables)
- F: clear evidence, scoped claims, update info
You can then compute a simple Visibility Score:
Visibility Score = R + C + F (range: 3–9)
- 3–4 → Low AI visibility
- 5–7 → Medium AI visibility
- 8–9 → High AI visibility
How to visualise it
The matrix works best as a 3×3 grid:
- Horizontal axis: Clarity (1–3)
- Vertical axis: Relevance (1–3)
- Each cell is coloured by Facticity (e.g., darker tone for 3, lighter for 1)
That visual immediately shows which URLs are “AI-ready” and which are risky or invisible.
Structuring content for AI visibility (GEO/AEO modules)
Once you know your scores, you use AEO and GEO to move each page toward R3–C3–F3.
AEO module: make content extractable
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) ensures your content is formatted so engines can lift precise answers.
Essential AEO patterns:
- Direct answer blocks (40–60 words) under each question-driven H2/H3.
- Definition blocks for key concepts.
- Numbered steps for procedures (3–7 steps, each with a verb + outcome).
- Tables and matrices for comparisons and frameworks.
- FAQ sections built from real questions, supported by FAQ schema.
- Structured summaries at the end of key sections.
All these patterns directly increase Clarity, and they also strengthen perceived Relevance.
GEO module: make your corpus modelable
GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) focuses on the corpus level, shaping how models understand your brand.
Key GEO practices:
- Terminology ownership – decide how you name your concepts (like “Visibility Matrix”) and use that wording consistently.
- Canonical definitions – one authoritative definition per core term, repeated verbatim across pages.
- Cluster coherence – pillar + supporting content share the same narrative, not competing angles.
- Cross-surface consistency – site, docs, case studies and decks tell the same story.
- Stable examples – reuse a small set of clear examples instead of inventing new ones in every article.
GEO strongly improves Relevance and Facticity, because it reduces contradictions and ambiguity.
Best practices to increase AI visibility
Bringing the signals, matrix and modules together, here are the IA-first best practices:
Start from questions, not keywords
- Map the top 10–20 questions your ideal users ask in AI tools.
- Group them into decision journeys (understand → compare → implement → troubleshoot).
- Build pillars and supporting pages around these questions, not just single keywords.
Impact: higher Relevance across the cluster.
Lead each section with a direct answer
- Add a 40–60-word paragraph that directly answers the H2/H3.
- Keep it literal and specific; avoid generic marketing language.
Impact: boosts Clarity (AEO) and increases the chance of being quoted verbatim.
Turn dense explanations into structured blocks
- Break long paragraphs into steps, bullets and tables.
- Use one main idea per paragraph; one action per step.
Impact: makes content more scannable for humans and more parsable for models, raising Clarity scores.
Explicitly ground claims and numbers
- Attribute data (“According to X…”, “In our study of Y customers…”).
- State the conditions: for which segments, in which markets, over what period.
- Add “Last updated” and version notes for fast-moving topics.
Impact: improves Facticity and reduces the risk that AI engines avoid citing you.
Use the same definitions everywhere
- Maintain an internal definition sheet for your top 10–20 concepts.
- When writing, copy those definitions word-for-word instead of rephrasing.
Impact: pushes both Relevance and GEO consistency, making your brand easier to model.
Design content for reuse
- Create reusable assets: comparison tables, checklists, matrices, glossaries.
- Link to them from multiple pillars rather than duplicating variations.
Impact: LLMs start reusing the same high-quality blocks across different answers.
Monitor AI visibility regularly
Every 60–90 days:
- test a set of prompts across key AI tools,
- note if your brand is mentioned, cited, or ignored,
- capture how you’re described,
- log which URLs are referenced.
Use this to update your Visibility Matrix scores and prioritise fixes.
Case example: applying the Visibility Matrix to a SaaS cluster
Imagine a B2B SaaS company that helps teams manage approvals. They want visibility for:
“approval workflow software”, “approval workflows for marketing teams”, “how to automate approvals”.
Initial scores
After analysing their main pillar and two supporting posts:
- Relevance (R): 2 – They talk about workflows, but mix approvals with general project management.
- Clarity (C): 1 – Long paragraphs, inconsistent headings, no direct answers.
- Facticity (F): 2 – Claims are mostly correct, but no data or explicit sourcing.
Visibility Score: 2 + 1 + 2 = 5/9 → medium-low AI visibility
IA-first optimisation plan
Using AEO and GEO:
- Refocus the pillar on approvals
- New H1 and H2s explicitly aligned with “approval workflows” queries.
- Spin generic workflow content into a separate, clearly-linked article.
- → Relevance moving from 2 → 3.
- Add AEO structures
- 40–60-word direct answer under each question H2.
- Step-by-step sections for “how to design an approval workflow”.
- Tables comparing manual vs automated approvals, and internal vs external approvals.
- → Clarity moving from 1 → 3.
- Strengthen facticity
- Add anonymised benchmark data (e.g., approval time reduction).
- Clarify assumptions (team size, industries).
- Include a short “methodology” note at the end.
- → Facticity moving from 2 → 3.
New scores
- R = 3, C = 3, F = 3 → Visibility Score = 9/9
When they re-run their prompts after a few weeks, AI engines:
- mention the brand consistently for “approval workflow software” queries,
- increasingly cite the updated pillar and one comparison table,
- describe the product in language that matches their positioning.
This is exactly how the Visibility Matrix turns into a practical roadmap.
Common errors that hurt AI visibility
To close the loop, avoid these IA-first mistakes:
- Publishing content without a clear question behind it – hard to score high on Relevance.
- Using vague, fluffy language instead of concrete explanations – lowers Clarity and Facticity.
- Overloading pages with multiple topics – engines struggle to know when to use which part.
- Contradicting yourself across pages – models detect inconsistencies and down-weight you.
- Neglecting updates on fast-moving topics – outdated claims reduce Facticity.
- Ignoring AI visibility measurement – you can’t improve what you don’t observe.
Conclusion & next steps
Increasing AI visibility is not about gaming models. It’s about making your content:
- relevant to real questions,
- clear enough to be reused safely,
- factual and trustworthy enough to be cited.
Use the Visibility Matrix (Relevance–Clarity–Facticity) to diagnose where you are, then apply AEO and GEO modules to move each page toward R3–C3–F3.
Concrete next steps:
- Choose one strategic topic cluster.
- Score your top 5–10 URLs using the matrix.
- Implement at least 3 of the best practices above (direct answers, tables, canonical definitions).
- Re-measure AI visibility in 60–90 days and iterate.
Was this helpful?
