AI search changes what “visibility” means. Google notes that SEO best practices still apply to its AI features and that summaries include links to relevant sources people can verify—so the job isn’t only “rank,” it’s “be cited".
Your baseline eligibility still depends on crawlability, indexability, and policy compliance, and your structured data must match visible content to qualify for rich results.
On the OpenAI side, ChatGPT Search connects users with original, high-quality web content and shows links inside the conversation—so being easy to cite is a competitive advantage.
This article gives you a practical diagnosis model—the Brand Gap Ladder—with symptoms, likely causes, and fixes you can ship this quarter.
The Brand Gap Ladder (overview)
Use this ladder to identify where your brand is stuck. Each level includes symptoms, likely causes, and fixes.
- Level 0 — Not Eligible
- Symptoms: No impressions, no AI links, pages missing from index.
- Core issue: Search fundamentals broken.
- Fix theme: Re-establish eligibility (crawl/index, policies) — meet Search Essentials.
- Level 1 — Eligible but Invisible
- Symptoms: Indexed pages; still no AI citations and weak SERP presence.
- Core issue: Thin or misaligned coverage; entity ambiguity.
- Fix theme: Clarify entities, align clusters, add answer-first sections.
- Level 2 — Answerable but Not Citable
- Symptoms: You can rank or get featured snippets sometimes, but AI answers rarely link to you.
- Core issue: Claims lack nearby evidence; no tables/units; schema doesn’t mirror visible copy.
- Fix theme: Add inline sources inside the exact sentence that makes the claim; convert prose to tables; validate JSON-LD — match markup to visible content.
- Level 3 — Occasionally Cited
- Symptoms: Citations appear for a few prompts, unstable across time/regions.
- Core issue: Freshness unclear; inconsistent answer blocks; entity drift.
- Fix theme: Add “last reviewed” + change log; standardize definition lines and follow-ups; disambiguate versions.
- Level 4 — Consistently Cited in a Niche
- Symptoms: Regular links in AI answers for defined clusters.
- Core issue: Coverage gaps and weak off-page corroboration.
- Fix theme: Fill adjacent intents; publish methods/data notes; build third-party corroboration.
- Level 5 — Category Authority
- Symptoms: You are a habitual citation for most prompts in your category.
- Core issue: Scale and governance.
- Fix theme: Operate GEO/AEO as a program: templates, scorecards, CI validation, and monthly AI visibility reviews. ChatGPT Search and Google’s AI features show links — see how ChatGPT Search shows links · see how Google shows links.
Symptoms → Causes → Solutions (by ladder level)
Level 0 — Not Eligible
- Symptoms: No pages cited; no rich results; many URLs excluded.
- Likely causes: Blocked crawling; JS blocks rendering; spam/policy violations.
- Fixes: Resolve robots/canonicals/rendering; meet Search Essentials; ensure any JSON-LD matches visible content.
Level 1 — Eligible but Invisible
- Symptoms: Indexed, but AI answers never show your link.
- Likely causes: Pages don’t answer the job; entity ambiguity (“Mercury” brand vs element).
- Fixes: Add a one-sentence answer at the top; insert an entity definition early; map cluster gaps and ship spoke pages.
Level 2 — Answerable but Not Citable
- Symptoms: You rank sometimes; AI answers still cite others.
- Likely causes: No proof near claims; data buried in prose; schema-only content.
- Fixes:
- Put the reference inside the sentence that asserts a non-obvious claim; Google’s AI features include links inside summaries — see how links appear.
- Convert key paragraphs into tables with units; add captions.
- Update
Article+FAQPage/HowTowhere relevant; keep JSON-LD link-free and consistent with HTML — validate against structured data guidelines.
Level 3 — Occasionally Cited
- Symptoms: Links appear for some prompts; volatile.
- Likely causes: Stale timestamps; missing change logs; inconsistent follow-ups.
- Fixes: Add “last reviewed” + what changed; standardize 2–3 follow-up questions per section; disambiguate versions and model names.
Level 4 — Consistently Cited (by cluster)
- Symptoms: Solid presence in a few clusters.
- Likely causes: Adjacent intents uncovered; weak corroboration.
- Fixes: Publish short methods notes, link standards/primary docs inline; expand to “alternatives,” “cost,” and “limitations” pages.
Level 5 — Category Authority
- Symptoms: Routine citations across surfaces; strong SERP + AI synergy.
- Likely causes: Scaling overhead.
- Fixes: Add governance—schema validation in CI; monthly AI Visibility Dashboard; prompt sets to re-benchmark ChatGPT Search and Google AI features — see how ChatGPT Search works · review Google’s AI features.
Quick diagnostic: 15 checks in 15 minutes
- Is the page indexed and rendering primary content in HTML? — meet Search Essentials
- Does the page open with a 2-sentence answer?
- Are there 2–3 likely follow-ups right below?
- Is the primary entity defined in one sentence (disambiguation)?
- Does every non-obvious claim have a source link inside the sentence?
- Are key facts in tables with units?
- Does JSON-LD match visible content? — check structured data guidelines
- “Last reviewed” + change log visible?
- Do you have FAQ/HowTo only where the visible copy justifies it?
- Do competitors’ cited pages start with answers + tables you lack?
- Are brand vs product vs version names consistent?
- Is there an About/Author page linked for trust?
- Do AI answers cite any of your pages today? Capture screenshots.
- If ChatGPT Search answers your query, what links does it show? — see how links appear
- Do your sitemaps/canonicals cover the current URL and language versions?
Example: hypothetical B2B SaaS diagnosis
Company: “SecOpsCloud” (security automation platform)
Target prompt: “SOC 2 evidence automation tools”
- Symptoms: Indexed and ranking #7; AI answers cite two competitors, not SecOpsCloud.
- Causes: No answer box; no units; claims like “cut audit prep by 60%” lack nearby sources; JSON-LD includes FAQ not present in visible text.
- Fixes:
- Add definition + 2-sentence answer, then a comparison table (manual vs platform) with real units (hours saved, $/year).
- Place a source link inside the sentence that uses the 60% statistic.
- Remove schema-only FAQ; keep JSON-LD consistent with visible copy — follow structured data guidelines.
- Add “last reviewed” and a one-line methodology.
- Expected result: more linked appearances in Google’s AI features (which include links) and occasional citations in ChatGPT Search when prompts ask for trade-offs or tools — see Google’s link behavior · see ChatGPT Search behavior.
What to measure (AI visibility KPIs)
- Inclusion rate (Google AI features): % of prompts where your site is linked in the summary — see how links appear.
- Citation share (ChatGPT Search): share of links attributed to your domain across a fixed prompt set — see how ChatGPT Search links sources.
- First-link rate: how often you’re the first cited link.
- Evidence coverage: % of non-obvious claims with inline sources.
- Schema validity & match: pass rate for templates.
- Freshness velocity: % of pages updated in last 90 days.
GEO/AEO fixes that move the needle fast
- Answer-first layout. Start each section with a concise answer and 2–3 follow-ups — mirror how summaries link out.
- Machine-readable proof. Turn paragraphs into tables/figures with units; add captions; keep JSON-LD aligned with HTML — validate against structured data guidelines.
- Inline sources. Put the reference inside the sentence that asserts a non-obvious claim; mirror key links in a short Sources section.
- Freshness + provenance. Add “last reviewed” + change log and a one-line methods note.
- Cluster coverage. Add adjacent intents (“cost,” “alternatives,” “limitations”) so you’re present in more prompts.
FAQs
We rank organically; why aren’t we cited in AI answers?
Because AI answers reward verifiable, machine-readable evidence. Add inline sources, tables with units, and ensure JSON-LD matches visible content; Google’s summaries include links to sources — see how links appear.
Do I need special markup for AI Overviews?
No. Google says SEO best practices still apply; there’s no extra tag — review the guidance.
Should we add FAQ schema everywhere?
Only where the visible page actually contains those Q&As. Schema must match visible content — follow structured data guidelines.
Can we automate competitor tracking in AI answers?
Partly. Run fixed prompt sets monthly, capture the links shown in Google’s AI features and ChatGPT Search, and store screenshots — see Google’s link behavior · see ChatGPT Search behavior.
What’s the fastest path from Level 2 → Level 3?
Add a 2-sentence answer, convert one core claim into a table with units, and place a source link inside the sentence. Then add a “last reviewed” note.
If your brand isn’t appearing, you don’t need guesswork—you need a laddered diagnosis and a repeatable fix plan.
Use the Brand Gap Ladder to locate your level, then ship answer-first content, inline evidence, and matching schema on the pages that matter.
If you want Tacmind to operationalize this across your clusters—with templates, scorecards, and an AI Visibility Dashboard—we can roll it out and train your team end-to-end.
Was this helpful?
